The hornet’s nest of the Middle East, driven by American energy policy

September 14, 2012

Sharp view of the current situation in the Muslim world from John Aziz at azizonomics. In his view, this comes down to a root problem of decades of American oil policy:

The YouTube video depicting Mohammed is nothing more than the straw that broke the camel’s back. This kind of violent uprising against American power and interests in the region has been a long time in the making. It is not just the continuation of drone strikes which often kill civilians in Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia and Afghanistan, either. Nor is it the American invasions and occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan. Nor is it the United States and the West’s support for various deeply unpopular regimes such as the monarchies in Bahrain and Saudi Arabia (and formerly Iran). Nor is it that America has long favoured Israel over the Arab states, condemning, invading and fomenting revolution in Muslim nations for the pursuit of nuclear weapons while turning a blind eye to Israel’s nuclear weapons and its continued expansion into the West Bank.

All of these things (and many more) have contributed to Muslim and Arab anger toward the United States and the West. Yet the underlying fact of all of these historical threads has been the United States’ oil-driven foreign policy. Very simply, the United States has for over half a century pursued a foreign policy in the region geared toward maintaining the flow of oil out of the region at any cost — even at the cost of inflaming the irrational and psychopathic religious elements that have long existed in the region.

This is not to defend the barbaric elements who resort to violence and aggression as a means of expressing their disappointment with U.S. foreign policy. It is merely to recognise that you do not stir the hornet’s nest and then expect not to get stung. 

And the sad thing is that stirring the hornet’s nest is totally avoidable. There is plenty of oil and energy capacity in the world beyond the middle east. The United States is misallocating capital by spending time, resources, energy and manpower on occupying the middle east and playing world policeman. Every dollar taken out of the economy by the IRS to be spent drone striking the middle east into the stone age is a dollar of lost productivity for the private market. It is a dollar of productivity that the market could have been spent increasing American energy capacity and energy infrastructure in the United States — whether that is in oil, natural gas, solar, wind or hydroelectric.

  • Sammy

    You are misinformed. Europe gets much more of its oil from these animals than we do. If it’s our energy policy it is the fault of the environmentalists and the EPA. I would burn coal in an unfiltered plant before I would buy oil from opec.It’s not like we don’t have our own resources. World war is unavoidable, but this time we have no industry to call upon to produce the defense weapons needed for us to survive. Combine that with the intentional neglect of our boarders that have allowed foreign agents into our country to attack us from within. All of this has been planned and permitted by the worst administration to ever be elected.

    • http://www.ericgarland.co ericgarland

      My warmest regards to your countrymen in the Republic of Derpistan.

  • wmmoye

    Sammy’s comments are mildly interesting and not entirely without merit. I’m not sure I can actually look back over the past several decades on any one US president that has actually performed at an “A” level across the board (or, even if things were “good” during their administration, policy decisions they made set us up for major problems later…). I’m certainly not in favor of continuing the current administration, nor am I enthused at the two options (we have other options), but the Commission on Presidential Debates (controlled by the two main parties) won’t allow the American people a real choice.

    As for world war–or the continuation on our current fronts–it would seem that pulling our military back to protect our borders while applying our American ingenuity in an aggressive plan to free ourselves from OPEC (or any other foreign source of energy) might deliver the biggest strategic benefits (including sealing our porous borders). If that means burning coal while we work to efficiently and inexpensively harness the sun, wind, water, and immense amount of hot air in this country, then so be it. We would at least have some additional incentive (eliminating the pollution of fossil fuel plants) to fuel our efforts at energy independence.

    I’m certainly not in favor of isolationism, but the ROI on our long-term oil-based energy policy is falling by the day. Let’s get out of the Middle East and leave it to the current inhabitants. Let them enjoy the 135 degree days along with the other many endearing qualities of this volatile region. And, if they want to come to America to get some after we’ve left them alone, we’ll unleash our well-rested, well-trained, green-powered, high-tech military on them (along with the requisite Toby Keith song). Bring it.

Previous post:

Next post: